I’m sure it’s already happening.
I’m sure it’s already happening.
How dare journalists be compensated for their labor!
The weirdest one I found was a site that would only check to see if what you entered started with the correct password. So if your password was hunter2 and you tried hunter246, it would let you in.
Which means not only were they storing the password, but they had to go out of their way to use the wrong kind of string comparison.
Mine is the null string. They’ll never guess it!
You break it down into chunks and delegate. They’re not expecting any one person to implement the whole thing.
I hate that anyone has to be told not to truncate passwords. Like even if you haven’t had any training at all, you’d have to be advanced stupid to even come up with that idea in the first place.
“Don’t use virtualization”, says exec whose product doesn’t run on virtualization
It also reduces brake wear on the trains, so they’ll need new brakes less often, and it improves air quality in the stations. Most of that black dust you see is brake dust. And you’re breathing it in, too.
Yeah it’s not open source at all. This is source-available.
Also, they uploaded the source to Shoutcast’s proprietary stuff: https://github.com/WinampDesktop/winamp/issues/11
There are provisions in the DMCA for filing false claims.
I don’t think they should be liable for what their text generator generates. I think people should stop treating it like gospel. At most, they should be liable for misrepresenting what it can do.
They’re trained for generating text, not factual accuracy. And they’re very good at it.
We’re already there, no AI needed. Rates are all generated by computer. Ask your agent why your rate went up and they’ll say “idk computer said so”.
Processing isn’t the expensive part. It’s bandwidth. Transferring that much data gets expensive.
It’s probably because the uploader will not see these comments
We’ve been doing it often enough that we’ve adopted a term for it, yes.
So what word should we use when describing all of those people in one group?
So what should we say when discussing people who make video, audio, text media?
I see their point about “content”, where, on YouTube, for example, it devalues the videos as subordinate to YouTube as a platform, but I think as people use the word “content” it loses that connotation.
Any company whose primary focus is not software always has shit for software.
I don’t know if it’s because manufacturing companies don’t really care about it, or they feel they should cut corners everywhere they can, or what, but it seems to be a universal phenomenon.
The headline is extremely optimistic, but it’s not clickbait.